Mudanças entre as edições de "Página principal"
m (Limpou toda a página)
|Linha 1:||Linha 1:|
Edição das 12h08min de 18 de fevereiro de 2019
Group and lastly across the sample as a entire. Disagreements on themes had been discussed till agreement was reached. Outcomes Thirty-six individuals were interviewed in between January and October 2011, the point at which information saturation20 was judged comprehensive. Thirty-four (94 ) of the sufferers were White British, with two reporting Other White background. The mean age of individuals was 51 using a selection of 299, and 10 (28 ) from the participants had been male. The imply PHQ 9 at baseline was 19, with a array of 1227. The sample was hence representative of the wider trial population with regards to gender and ethnicity, but the interviewed participants had been on typical older (51 years when compared with 39 years inside the trial overall). Two thirds on the sample utilized the MoodGYM programme. Precise differences in themes amongst MoodGYM (MG) and Beating the Blues (BtB) programmes weren't evident in the data and differences involving the programmes didn't seem to become linked with any variations in AMG-176 Purity & Documentation Patient encounter, and consequently we didn't perceive it to be needed toKnowles SE, et al. BMJ Open 2015;5e008581. doi10.1136bmjopen-2015-recruit further participants who had utilised BtB. Each programmes consist of modular `sessions' lasting about 45 min, advised to be completed at a price of one per week (six sessions for MG and eight for BtB), which guide the user by means of cognitive behaviour therapy principles including interactive workout routines and weekly `homework' assignments to become completed involving sessions. Three essential themes emerged in the information acceptability; engagement and adherence; perceived absence of support. When patients varied in their reported acceptability, frequent difficulties relating to adherence and assistance have been reported across the whole sample. Patient acceptability perceived rewards and barriers We observed in the information that participants may be broadly classified as `positive', `negative' or `ambivalent' primarily based on their perceptions of cCBT. While it is actually not standard to formally group qualitative respondents within this way, the easy categorisation adopted here may have utility within the context of this pragmatic assessment of wellness technologies. Seventeen participants were categorised as `ambivalent' (7 Beating the Blues, 10 MoodGYM), 10 have been categorised as `negative' (two Beating the Blues, 8 MoodGYM) and nine as `positive' (4 Beating the Blues, five MoodGYM). Patient characteristics and classifications are presented in table 1. Classifications had been reached from consensus among the qualitative team primarily based on rereading of the transcripts and identifying consistent differences in patient experience relating to their all round perception getting constructive, unfavorable or ambivalent. It truly is notable that these categorisations didn't map clearly onto expressed prior preference for cCBT (this was discerned from a single item query at baseline which asked "Do you have a preference for receiving computerised therapy"), with no constant partnership amongst expressing a preference for cCBT or not at baseline and no matter whether the participant consequently reported being constructive or adverse following experiencing the intervention (while numbers are also little to draw any definitive conclusions). This suggests participants may not be capable to accurately predict whether the computerised therapy is acceptable for them primarily based on initial preferences alone. Extracts illustrating the perceived barriers and benefits are shown in table two. Particularly, the four subthemes of Acceptabili.